Tomgate: How Rodney Tom Betrayed Washington

Rodney Tom violated the most basic duty of an elected official, which is to put the voters' interests before the politicians personal interests.


THE 2012 GENERAL ELECTION made at least this clear: Washington voters wanted Democrats, and not Republicans, leading the State. A Democrat was elected to every executive position, except one (Secretary of State), including Governor, Attorney General, and U.S. Senator. And voters reelected enough Democrats to the State Senate to ensure the party’s control. It was, for the Democrats, a sweep.

And yet the Democratic turncoat Rodney Tom took it upon himself to ignore the voters and instead hand control of the Senate over to Republicans. Tom, a Senator from the 48th Legislative District, which includes Bellevue, and Tim Sheldon, Senator from the 35th Legislative District, joined Senate Republicans to establish what they are calling, rather misleadingly, a “majority coalition caucus.”

Now, Republicans control the Senate with 25 members to the Democrats’ 24 members. As a result, Tom will be the Senate’s majority leader, while Sheldon will be the President Pro Tempore (a position that presides over the Senate in the Lieutenant Governor’s absence). And as Senate majority leader, Tom wields great power: he appoints the chair of different committees and also controls the Senate’s schedule.

Tom’s actions offend more than just the voters’ will; his actions offend the base level obligation of an elected official. I am devoutly of the opinion that elected officials should unabashedly place the interests of their constituents over their own; elected officials, after all, are elected to serve the public and not to serve themselves. But Tom disregarded the fact that in 2010 voters reelected him as a Democrat who promised to fight for and uphold the Democratic Party’s progressive values.

The rationale for Tom’s betrayal is apparent: in 2010, Republicans spent nearly $1 million trying to unseat him. It was likely the case that Republicans would take aim at Tom again in 2014. But now Tom has pacified his otherwise Republican challengers and so has dodged what would have been a conservative firing squad. And the Republican money that would have been spent to defeat him will now likely fill his coffers. Put another way, Tom chose to protect his own longevity as an elected politician at the expense of the majority of his voting constituency.

What is most sad about Tom’s about-face is, I think, this: momentum toward comprehensive gun control reformation is finally gaining traction. And yet as Senate majority leader, Tom will more than likely do whatever he can, in a further attempt to appease his now conservative base, to stifle whatever sorely needed gun control changes are proposed, including a possible assault weapons ban.  


 Trent Latta is an attorney and he lives in Kirkland. He can be reached at TrentLatta@gmail.com.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Barbara Manley January 12, 2013 at 07:08 PM
Should our political system ever get to the point where people do not campaign under a particular party designation, this would be great. However, until that day, their declaration of party affiliation is what most people rely on when making ballot choices. Voters should be able to trust that the candidate is actually a representative of the party they declare and that elects them. To act otherwise is cowardly, dishonest, self-serving, and a perfect reason to oust that person in the next election. I did not cheer when Rodney pulled this before - it is a despicable act no matter which party benefits.
Bradpwa January 19, 2013 at 06:28 AM
David in Bellevue - Is that a joke? Tom was a Republican and switched parties. Pretty clear he was not a party loyalist.
Lise Quinn February 08, 2013 at 01:33 AM
Lise Quinn February 08, 2013 at 01:46 AM
Nope, you are wrong, most people want to see the rich pay an equitable amount of taxes in comparison to the rest of the 98%. Most people want our social services to remain and not to be cut. If you were right, then the peoples would not have elected a democratic president or a democratic majority in the Washington State Senate and Representatives "2012: Republicans lost eight other state executive races, plus all three open U.S. House seats, and barely mounted a challenge to U.S. Sen. Maria Cantwell."
Lise Quinn February 08, 2013 at 01:48 AM
In other words - no one should have trusted this flip-flopper or at least only trusted him to flip flop!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »